The assessment of the projects under the scope of this report was carried out through a computing programme that scans available documentation and website filters paired with manual assessment of output datasets.
Through these two approaches we are able to cover more than 500 projects while keeping a consistent and comprehensive analysis of what information is available. Due to differences in the information available for GCF and CIF, we have adapted the methodology accordingly so slight changes in how the assessment is made for the two funds were made. Each assessment either fully satisfies, partially satisfies or fails to satisfy the indicator.
If partially satisfying the indicator, this will be counted as 0.5 towards the final number of projects satisfying the indicator.